• randomsnark
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I believe you’re thinking of Dunbar’s Number, but it’s 150 rather than 300. Which does fit better with your original claim.

    • 768@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yo that’s the one. Quick skew on wikipedia and I wonder how reliable it is though, given the confidence intervals and broad scope (apes?).