• spauldo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is a shortage of cheap oil.

    Time was you could find it bubbling up on the surface. Then you had to dig for it. Then you had to frack. Then oil was expensive enough to justify going back to the old oilfields and pumping water down some of them to push it into the others.

    Sure, there’s oil there, but it’s harder and harder to get. That’s why protected areas that still have easy oil are a target for the oil companies.

    • notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok yes, the EROI is going down.

      But the point is that it doesn’t matter if there is oil shortage or not. Even if there would be oil shortage, it is not (and should not be) the main reason why we’re moving away from oil.

      • spauldo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Economic reasons are the best reasons. They’re the reasons that work.

        I don’t think it matters why we move away from oil, as long as we do.

        • notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They are the path of least resistant yes. But that path often leads to collective losses, or if the stakes are high, like in climate change, to collective destruction. We get stuck in the Nash equilibrium of a prisoners dilemma.

          • spauldo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s true. Without economic pressure it’s a lot harder to get governments to cooperate, though. If economics favor you it’s easier to get the right laws passed.