• Anticorp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s understandable that you don’t understand a measurement system you’re not familiar with, but us imperials understand it just fine.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure. How much does water in a 1ft × 2ft × 3ft aquarium weigh?

      In metric, an equivalent calculation is 30 cm × 60 cm × 90 cm = 3 × 6 × 9 dm^3 = 162 𝑙 ≡ 162 kg of water, and if you’re pedantic, the weight is around 1620 N or closer to 1590 N for 𝑔 = 9.8 m·s-2. All calculated in my head.

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A cubic foot is 7.48 gallons, close enough to 7.5. 1 gallon of water is 8.33 lbs ≈ 25/3.

        6 * 7.5 = 45 gallons

        45 * 25/3 = 375 lbs – easy mental math. Sure, the “accurate” answer is 373.87 lbs, but the aquarium probably isn’t filled with distilled water, perfectly dimensionally accurate, or filled to that exact capacity.

        • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          A cubic foot is 7.48 gallons, close enough to 7.5

          1 gallon of water is 8.33 lbs ≈ 25/3.

          25/3

          Oh god this is what we mean

          • kurap1ka@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh just wait until you see imperial hex screws. In metric you get them in screwdriver size relating to mm. US hex screws are like 16/64 of an inch or 5/16 of an apple. And of course they don’t relate to metric at all and you can’t use the same tools.

            • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Or fucking AWG. Higher number means smaller diameter wire, and Americans are afraid of decimal or negative numbers so large diameters are 00, 000 etc. The formula is batshit insane
              𝑑𝑛 = 0.005 in × 92^(36 – 𝑛)/39^
              so people just use a lookup table.

              • ultracritical@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Gauge is historically number of passes through gauging machine. With the machine and material in question being different for every single one. We took that and put it to a standard, so it’s super messy and makes no sense.

                • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Well, I wonder what kind of gauging machine can do -3 passes for 0000 wire… /s

                  Too bad AWG is so ubiquitous it’s starting to creep into Europe.

          • ultracritical@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s only arbitrarily easy since water has a density of 1 kg/l in metric, as it was designed to do so. If you happened to know the density of water is 62.2 lb/ft^3 then the equation is roughly 123*60 which is 360 lb. 372 if you can actually paid attention to what common core was trying to teach. If the material was anything other then water the math would be just as difficult to do in imperial or metric.

            Metric is still far superior as the harmonized units make density in particular much easier to convert between. About the only thing imperial is better at is thread pitch of screws. I will also maintain that when describing human temperatures for weather Fahrenheit is a superior scale, but that’s just more personal preference and experience then any rational basis.

            • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s only arbitrarily easy since water has a density of 1 kg/l in metric, as it was designed to do so.

              it was designed to do so

              That’s also what we mean

              I will also maintain that when describing human temperatures for weather Fahrenheit is a superior scale

              That’s one where I’d say it’s almost entirely personal preference. Water freezing being at zero is handy because it’s nice to know when there’s ice/snow outside, but that’s also something you could just learn to remember in Fahrenheit too. Doesn’t really matter with that system. Kelvin and Celsius being bros is nice but it’s extremely rare that I use that so eh.

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I wonder how many people know these numbers. With the level of US education, probably 10%. Not to mention, most quantities will not be exact feet, more like 2’5". Good luck multiplying that, at least 74 cm is easy to type into a calculator.

            Anyway, if you ask a European how much a liter of water weighs, 95% will say “a kilo” without much hesitation.