Conference fails to approve procedural motion to take up defense spending bill as government shutdown looms

The House Republican speaker, Kevin McCarthy, was dealt his second humiliating defeat of the week on Thursday, when his conference again failed to approve a procedural motion as members continued to clash over government spending levels with just days left to avert a federal shutdown.

With no clear path forward in Republicans’ negotiations, the House concluded its work on Thursday without any stated plan to reconvene on Friday.

“Discussions related to [fiscal year 2024] appropriations are ongoing,” Congressman Tom Emmer, the House Republican whip, said in a statement. “Members are advised that ample notice will be given ahead of any potential votes tomorrow or this weekend.”

  • queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    To have a functioning bad government.

    Bipartisanship is suicide in the long run.

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The choices are the status quo or worse. There is no option for better that they’re rejecting by using bipartisanship to pass a clean CR.

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And how does not making a deal with McCarthy to pass a clean CR help with that exactly?

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Whatever deal they make will mean more money for the military, more money for drilling, more money for mining, more money for deforestation, and more money for brinkmanship.

            America has to stop destroying the world.

            • candybrie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              A lot of that falls under essential services and will continue to be done whether or not the money is there. Additionally, if the democrats had a super majority and trifecta, do you think that would actually change?

              • queermunist she/her
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                There won’t be any new projects approved, though, and that coubts for something.

                But yeah, even if the government was 100% Democrat they’d do the same shit, because America’s evil is bipartisan.

        • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You want to look like an unhinged melodramatic who shouldn’t be taken seriously?

          Because statements like that are how you look like an unhinged melodramatic who shouldn’t be taken seriously.

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s the Internet, no one takes anything seriously here 🙄

            Leaving that aside, extraction of fossil fuels is going to fucking kill everyone and has bipartisan support. Also making war with Russia and pushing for war with China, two nuclear powers. Also filling the ocean with plastic, chopping down the forests, making new pandemics in factory farms, and many other new horrors.

            If you aren’t alarmed you aren’t paying attention.