And it really irks me a lot.

Update: Man, I have gotten tons of great responses here and a lot of activity. The comments section turned out way better than Reddit. Thank you all! <3

  • Anticorp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought it was all so far fetched that they just kept on allowing obviously evil people, people who were opposed to the very ideals of the school, continue with their plots unchallenged. Then 2020 rolled around and I was like “oh… Well this feels familiar”.

    • Orphie Baby@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This one bothered me pretty early. But I don’t feel like the context given in the Harry Potter series would allow for anything like the corruption we see in real-life politics. For one, a couple people are professors of Hogwarts for power, but most are in it because they care about their jobs. There’s no reason nobody stood up to Dolores— all students and professors hated her (except her new toady Filch, and maybe only a few Slytherin after she offered them power?) and Dolores was exerting power over the school that she simply didn’t have. Any one of them could have just effed her up anytime for her literal, no joke Nazi rules and her torture. Let alone a full disgruntled school.

      • Anticorp
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wasn’t she empowered by the ministry of magic, which was in turn controlled by money?

        • Orphie Baby@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Position, yes. Actual power to stop a bunch of angry, tortured teenage wizards— especially ones that have been learning to use defense magic in direct defiance of her— no. Also she pissed off all the professors, and they didn’t stand up to her either, which is stupid.

          • Anticorp
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That all comes back to the institutional power of the system. She was backed by what they all considered to be the legal government entity, so tolerated her, even though they could have physically overpowered her, despite knowing that what she was doing was wrong. Just like a lot of Americans in 2020.

            • Orphie Baby@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              “Wrong” isn’t even a fraction of it. She kicked everyone off the grounds, changed all the rules, tortured students (and others knew it) and literally started hanging up Nazi rule plaques. It was a hostile takeover where she silenced, banned, and abused everyone. And you’re going to tell me nobody— no students, no professors— are going to stand against her? Being appointed won’t mean shit when you are literally torturing, backing into a corner, and banning an opposition with this much power and unhappiness. In any reasonable situation, they would fight back. She was just one stupid, powerless woman with no soldiers at her command against hundreds of powerful wizards and witches, many of them adults.

              And stop comparing it to “2020”. I don’t even know what the eff that means.

              • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Honestly, tolerating oppression has always been the human condition. The few times people did try to revolt are so lauded specifically because they’re exceptions that prove the rule. So the fact that that happened in the books should surprise no one – it’s much more true to life.

                • Orphie Baby@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  These aren’t adults who need food and housing. These are a bunch of teenagers including rebellious sorts against a single asshole with very little actual power besides a title. Also they have (probably angry) parents?

                  • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Okay then. Convince everyone in your town to rebel against the TSA agents at your local airport and to throw out the body scanning machines. Those TSA agents are just humans run by corrupt managers, run by an even more corrupt and tyrannical organization, all for money. Teenagers are scanned in those things and the TSA holds copies of the scanners’ images of their naked bodies. Right wing parents across the country have been angry about this for years, and they’re armed to the teeth.

                    So it should be simple by your logic. Right?

              • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                If they fight back, they’re go to Azkaban.

                JK was writing about how evil happens is it comes from top. As such if the professors fought back, they’d be an enemy of the state and sent to Azkaban.

                She was powerful because the system backed her. Had the anyone attacked her, aurors would have come to save her.

                The 2020 reference is a lame attempt to attack Trump. The two are not comparable. Everything worked as it should have. So it’s the exact opposite of what JK was writing about.