• devils_advocate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t the main worry the “side product” of weapons grade nuclear materials?

    • player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are nuclear plants in operation today that do not use or create any fuel that is capable of being weaponized. In fact, coal plants admit much more radiation than a modern nuclear power plant.

      • devils_advocate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are nuclear plants in operation today that do not use or create any fuel that is capable of being weaponized.

        And they cost too much. Governments only fund weaponizeable fission.

        In fact, coal plants admit much more radiation than a modern nuclear power plant.

        Not in a way that can be concentrated and weaponized.

    • elouboub@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t have the sources right now, but nuclear reactor designs exist that output minimal weapons grade materials and some that output none at all. IIRC they are in use already, but I’d have to check what their names are.

      • devils_advocate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. It’s possible, but they are not of interest to nuclear power states.