• ThePac
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a union organizer in an adjacent industry (video games). This is a very common anti-union talking point amongst bosses and managers that want to look progressive. The underlying message is “I’m ok with unions, but not here”.

    • SquiffSquiff@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      With respect, I would disagree. Taking it personally is a problem. Expecting everyone else to ‘just trust me bro’ is a problem. Look at it another way- ‘if my staff unionize and anything needs to change then I’ve already failed as a boss’

      • bfr0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        This seems like a weird interpretation, at least based on the paraphrasing above. There’s no implicit anti union sentiment, it’s just acknowledging he has an obligation to be a good steward for his employees?

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s wrong in the sense that he apparently believes that he is able to provide everything that a union does, which is hilarious.

      A union has hundreds or thousands of specialist employees working full time for the members, and this guy is like: “yeah I can do that while also managing my company”.

      At best he is saying “I’m willing to pay people to shut the fuck up.”

      In reality he probably doesn’t even have a clue about what a union is about.