Scientific American

  • bauhaus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    What you’ve shown is the system -democracy - working as intended. I’m not sure how that’s a criticism.

    That’s the problem. You get one party in power who doesn’t like it for some reason, it’s gone.

    except your “evidence” proves the exact opposite.

    • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kinda like how Reagan removed the fairness doctrine… Oh, sure, any ol’ President could have it restored… 8 years of Clinton, 8 years of Obama, 2+ years of Biden… Hey, it’s only been since 1987… 36 years… I’m sure it will be back any day now…

      • bauhaus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        what does that have to do with government funding of journalism?

        • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My argument is that anything the government grants you can also be taken away… and if the counter is “But it can be restored too…”

          Yeah, still waiting on the Fairness Doctrine, which, yeah, also has a direct impact on journalism.

          • bauhaus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            My argument is that anything the government grants you can also be taken away… and if the counter is “But it can be restored too…”

            it’s easy to win your own arguments when you put words in my mouth. why even bother pretending to have a debate when all you want is to put on a performance?

            you can wallow in defeatist nihilism. I have better things to do.