• queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem is both chaotic and neutral characters follow their hearts.

    Which is why I view chaotic characters as being willing to do blatantly self-destructive or uncomfortable things just for the sake of thumbing their nose at authority. The chaotic evil character doesn’t kill people because she wants to, she does it because you don’t want her to.

    • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your interpretation is your own, but I as I eluded to before, I view neutrals as a half and half of lawful and chaotic.

      In my mind, neutrals don’t follow the law to the tee, but they aren’t entirely swayed by the impulse of their heart either.

      They could be the type with informal rules they won’t break, like an evil character that refuses to kill children, but doesn’t care what happens otherwise.

      They could be a rule bender, like a good character who generally see rules as a good thing, but turn a blind eye to the rules they deem against the people, or bend them to breaking point to help others.

      Could even be a true neutral character who goes with the flow. They do what is needed to complete the mission - they will use the rules to their advantage, but aren’t above breaking them when that fails.

      Sure you could say these sway towards lawful and chaotic, but that’s the point. Neutral is a mix of the two, not necessarily its own thing. That’s why I don’t see neutrals as a problem here.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s all up to personal interpretation, of course!

        I think neutrals only listen to their heart, whereas chaotic characters actually specifically hate the law. Demons are chaotic, not because they’re passionate, but because they oppose order and morals and rules.

        A neutral character only considers the law when thinking about consequences. A chaotic character always considers the law because fuck the police I won’t do what you tell me!

        • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree, everybody is entitled to their own opinions on this - plus at the end of the day, as long as the table you’re on is on the same page, you’re good no matter what anyone else thinks.

          So how would your interpretation cover chaotic good?
          Chaotic evil in your mind is basically a murderhobo that kills and destroy because fuck society and fuck the rules, but a good person wouldn’t want to kill and destroy just to spite the rules no?

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think the epitome of chaotic good would basically be a radical that wants to dethrone all gods and all kings. While they certainly hate rules and laws they wouldn’t want to necessarily kill and destroy just to spite them, because they’re still good. Good and evil alignment still matters in that case. They’d still definitely enjoy whenever they get the chance to break the law for a good cause.