Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up1773arrow-down114cross-posted to: vivaldi_browservivaldi_browsernews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldprivacy@chat.maiion.comtechnology@feddit.chtechnologysysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1759arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square102fedilinkcross-posted to: vivaldi_browservivaldi_browsernews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldprivacy@chat.maiion.comtechnology@feddit.chtechnologysysadmin@reddthat.comhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squaredarkkitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agolegally yes they’ve been fined by numerous governments for excessive privacy violations
minus-squarejoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoThat’s fair but presumably, since they’re not racking up fines cumulatively, that they are now in accordance with the law… so are you saying that the current level is “reasonable”? Am I misunderstanding you point?
legally yes they’ve been fined by numerous governments for excessive privacy violations
That’s fair but presumably, since they’re not racking up fines cumulatively, that they are now in accordance with the law… so are you saying that the current level is “reasonable”? Am I misunderstanding you point?