Not a soul here believes that. Your post history is visible. You spell ‘bloc’ as “block” and your understanding of capitalism is that of a very young person’s. Not to mention, nobody would reply that they read Capital in full — they would say they’ve read Marx’s volume of Capital. You’re transparent.
Once again, I guarantee you’ve never read a page by Marx. You really should try it.
I guarantee you have never read a page by Marx. Your understanding of capitalism and socialism is shocking.
I have read Capital in full. Is there anything else?
What is your guarantee worth?
Not a soul here believes that. Your post history is visible. You spell ‘bloc’ as “block” and your understanding of capitalism is that of a very young person’s. Not to mention, nobody would reply that they read Capital in full — they would say they’ve read Marx’s volume of Capital. You’re transparent.
Once again, I guarantee you’ve never read a page by Marx. You really should try it.
How do we call a person ignorant of there being plenty of languages other than English, sometimes without such distinction between these words?
Anyway, spelling errors are indicative only of spelling errors.
My “understanding of capitalism” - ignorance and arrogance go together, and Marxists are a premier example of both.
Personal insults are forbidden here, but some time from now you might learn that people reply to all kinds of things differently.
I have already told you that you’ve shat yourself and asked what is your guarantee supported with. You are wrong. What will you do?
Wrecked. Better luck next time, liberal.
Holding a marxist to their world - and being called a liberal (what that even is). Classic
Oh, so now you don’t know what ‘liberal’ means, yet you’re content claiming you’ve studied Marx? Come on. Aren’t you embarrassed?