HughJanus to Reddit Migration@kbin.social · 11 months agoCoincidence that Reddit and Twitter are taking the same approaches to monetization?imagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up127arrow-down11
arrow-up126arrow-down1imageCoincidence that Reddit and Twitter are taking the same approaches to monetization?HughJanus to Reddit Migration@kbin.social · 11 months agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squareHughJanusOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·11 months agoI think you’re probably right but “that’s all there is to it” is a bit disingenuous unless you know something I don’t.
minus-squarelivus@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-211 months agoI don’t get why you’d think @Temperche is being disingenuous.
minus-squareHughJanusOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoBecause I haven’t seen and they haven’t provided any proof of that
minus-squarelivus@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·11 months agoOkay, but maybe don’t jump straight to calling someone a liar just because they don’t provide proof in their casual comment? You didn’t provide proof in your comment about Reddit losing VC funding due to interest rates, but that doesn’t mean you’re trying to mislead us.
minus-squareHughJanusOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoOkay well…I didn’t call them a liar so…what the fuck are you even on about?
minus-squarelivus@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-211 months agoSorry for the confusion, I think that’s what disingenuous normally means. Maybe you meant something else though.
minus-squarelivus@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·11 months agoI’m willing to believe you, but when I googled I got the definition in my link, which is what I thought it meant. Can you maybe tell me what you meant so next time I see someone call someone that, I can bear in mind it has more than one meaning?
minus-squareHughJanusOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoNothing about the definition you posted implies a lie.
I think you’re probably right but “that’s all there is to it” is a bit disingenuous unless you know something I don’t.
I don’t get why you’d think @Temperche is being disingenuous.
Because I haven’t seen and they haven’t provided any proof of that
Okay, but maybe don’t jump straight to calling someone a liar just because they don’t provide proof in their casual comment?
You didn’t provide proof in your comment about Reddit losing VC funding due to interest rates, but that doesn’t mean you’re trying to mislead us.
Okay well…I didn’t call them a liar so…what the fuck are you even on about?
Sorry for the confusion, I think that’s what disingenuous normally means.
Maybe you meant something else though.
That’s not at all what it means.
I’m willing to believe you, but when I googled I got the definition in my link, which is what I thought it meant.
Can you maybe tell me what you meant so next time I see someone call someone that, I can bear in mind it has more than one meaning?
Nothing about the definition you posted implies a lie.