• ShinkanTrain
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Somehow it’s okay for autism but the “R word” is highly offensive.

    Yeah? Only one of those words is a slur. It’s the one you literally can’t write down because it gets removed for being a slur.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      removed isn’t itself a slur just like autism isn’t. The context in which they’re used makes them a slur, and in OPs context, autistic is used as a slur.

      • ShinkanTrain
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’re still fighting the r-word war? Most people moved on around 2008 with the attack helicopter jokes.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          War?

          I don’t use the word removed in either it’s literal definition or as a slur, because there are better words in both cases. My response was that removed is not defined bad, and one can type out the entire word. It’s not like The N word that has one meaning, and it’s a slur where censoring the word word itself is often prudent. I’m not suggesting people should just throw the word removed around , just that it’s typeable and different than other censored words.

          • ShinkanTrain
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Prescriptivism being bullshit aside, how is an autistic person calling their interests autistic comparable to using that word as a slur?

            • BassTurd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              The word autistic has a definition and using it to define a type of inanimate objects is the incorrect use of it. Whether it’s being as a slur or not I’ll concede is a bit up for debate, but willfully taking a word that identifies a demographic based on how their brains work and using it to categorize games feels dirty and a bit slurry. Going back, the word removed wasn’t a slur until it was used incorrectly enough times that it became one. This particular case is not bad compared to other uses of the word autistic that I’ve seen so casually thrown about often synonymous with being dumb.