• blindbunny
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s fine, they’re going to loose their social security then they’ll have to sale to retire.

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Sell to whom? Too many live in large properties with land that has appreciated to the point that very, very few young people can entertain purchasing. So, instead, the house and/or land is sold to developers or banks, who will then demand an inordinate ROI on said investment, which usually means building “luxury homes” or whatever, which are also beyond the financial means of most younger people.

      • blindbunny
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        So, instead, the house and/or land is sold to developers or banks, who will then demand an inordinate ROl on said investment,

        Sounds like someone is going to have to take a loss. Or have squatters move in and cost them more in maintenance then it costs to sell.

        • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          There are literally millions of empty houses across America.

          We don’t really have a Supply issue, so much as we have a profit issue.

          • blindbunny
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Sounds like we need to start distributing homes and stop selling properties.