BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 month agoLG’s first 480Hz OLED gaming monitor is $1,000www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up128arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up127arrow-down1external-linkLG’s first 480Hz OLED gaming monitor is $1,000www.theverge.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square18fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJo MiranlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down5·1 month agoWhat’s the point if the human eye can’t see beyond 30fps?
minus-squareRai@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down4·1 month agoIt’s okay, I understood your comment without you needing to put that stupid “/s” in
minus-squareJo MiranlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoI thought the joke was obvious but the number of downvotes says otherwise.
minus-squareK̺͆e̺͆t̺͆a̺͆m̺͆i̺͆n̺͆e̺͆@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoDont display downvotes, save that cortisol
minus-squaref2sfljLhdtTZ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·1 month agoThat’s not entirely correct. Have you tried using a 60hz and 165hz monitor? The difference is not slight.
minus-squarecrawancon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·1 month agopresenting that human eye with the most up to date graphical developments provide a (however slight but still measurable) performance edge over slower refresh rates.
What’s the point if the human eye can’t see beyond 30fps?
It’s okay, I understood your comment without you needing to put that stupid “/s” in
I thought the joke was obvious but the number of downvotes says otherwise.
It was obvious to me!
Dont display downvotes, save that cortisol
That’s not entirely correct. Have you tried using a 60hz and 165hz monitor? The difference is not slight.
Number go up
presenting that human eye with the most up to date graphical developments provide a (however slight but still measurable) performance edge over slower refresh rates.