• Cataphract
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    This was such a weird time-line switch. Trump president again and progressives on Lemmy sound like r/conservative with law interpretation. So there’s no better response, no room for the very real needed evaluation of each situation, just a blanket “shoot em” now. Idk how people are so subjective to propaganda and influence when we have such a hard grasp on reality.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      A bunch of women shooting men for threatening to rape them would definitely get the stand your ground laws changed for the better. Sounds like a progressive win to me.

      Reality is a strange bedfellow.

      • Cataphract
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just an OG fantasy accelerationist eh? I can dig it, but I think they would dismiss it as not being fit for the definition. Judges can and are allowed to be fickle like that.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It would be wonderful to set the precedent that men can legally defend themselves but woman can’t. Let’s hope for fickle justices who can’t help themselves.