mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 9 hours agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up192arrow-down10cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secpp@programming.dev
arrow-up192arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 9 hours agomessage-square31fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secpp@programming.dev
minus-squareMonkderViertelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 hours agoHonestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
minus-squareTraister101@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 hours agoNah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
Honestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
Nah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
Sure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.