I have quite an extensive collection of media that my server makes available through different means (Jellyfin, NFS, mostly). One of my harddrives has some concerning smart values so I want to replace it. What are good harddrives to buy today? Are there any important tech specs to look out for? In the past I didn’t give this too much attention and it didn’t bite me, yet. But if I’m gonna buy a new drive now, I might as well…

I’m looking for something from 4TB upwards. I think I remember that drives with very high capacity are more likely to fail sooner - is that correct? How about different brands - do any have particularly good or bad reputation?

Thanks for any hints!

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’m looking for something from 4TB upwards.

    If you say “harddrive” … do you mean actual harddrives or are you using it synonymous with “storage”? If you really talk about actual harddrives, it’s hard to even find datacenter/server harddrives below 4 TB. Usually server HDDs start with 8 or 12 TB. You can even find HDDs with 20 TB - Seagate Exos series for example, starting at around 360 Euros (ca. 400 USD).

    If you’re in for a general storage, preferably SSD, that’s another issue. There is the Samsung 870 QVO (8 TB) SSD that is often advertised as “datacenter SSD” (so I assume it would run well in a server that is active 24/7), but it is currently available with a maximum of 8 TB. The 870 QVO is at ca. 70 Euros per terabyte (ca. 77 USD) which, in my experience, is the current price range for SSDs. So it has a high price seen from the outside but it’s actually fine. It’s also a one-time investment.

    For selfhosting I’d go with an SSD-only setup.

    do any have particularly good or bad reputation?

    From personal experience I’d say, stick with the “larger” brands like Samsung or Seagate.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      SSD only?

      Look at Mr Moneybags over here. That would increase my cost about 400%

      And no, I wouldn’t recoup that in energy cost reductions, as my oldest NAS with ancient drives only draws a few watts 97% of the time.

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Sorry, I can’t hear you under my enormous piles of money! 🙃

        But yeah. You should do an SSD-only setup if this is within your budget. I assume that for most of us selfhosting is just some soft of hobby. If you’re willing to spend money on the latest and cooles tech: do it. If not, then it’s fine, too.

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Okay, so … then maybe really look into the Seagate Exos drives. 20 TB should be pretty much fine for most selfhosting adventures.

        • e0qdk@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I have a few of those, and while the ones I bought have worked out fine so far, I think it’s worth cautioning people that they are annoyingly loud doing basic operations.

          • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Absolutely. They’re advertised for being used in datecenters, so I assume noise optimization wasn’t a concern for Seagate when creating those drives.

          • Ryan@discuss.tchncs.deOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            that wouldn’t be a problem for me, as my server is located in the basement. But good to know!