I think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane. I don’t care about the bans so stop trying to use that. HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Edit: Feel free to keep trying to brigade me. It’s not going to scare me to take this down

    • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
      64·
      4 months ago

      I don’t think they really helped with the financing

      All the computational resources the users tested the code base on must’ve been free.

      I’m surprised to see a sympathetic comment like this from an account on an instance that has them defederated

      Identity politics from .ml?

      If you’re surprised at such small acts of individual praxis, you’d be amazed at what we’ve accomplished in groups.

        • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
          53·
          4 months ago

          when I see financing like that but looking at like that isn’t incorrect

          None of the devs got paid. There are no other expenses.

          I normally expect people who hold sympathies towards hexbear to use an account on like lemm.ee so they don’t have to use more than one account to browse everything they want to see

          You expect the convenient implementation of MLK’s white moderate. But, my content should give no indication of that stereotype.

          I’ll answer your previous question: I’ve personal accounts on world, ee, ml, and hexbear. The fediverse doesn’t limit viewing content from multiple accounts concurrently. One must only choose an account to post. The only obstacle to such a tool is a means to avoid burdening the fediverse with duplicate responses to content requests. We solved that problem in a few hours.

          If you want actual insight communicated properly then you should ask in the correct venue. For example, I’d have no issue explaining in nuance on hexbear because the majority has a strong understanding or conversion of theory to praxis. I’m not even needed. Others would adequately explain on my behalf.

            • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
              71·
              4 months ago

              I’ve perceived only good faith from your posts. I apologize if I’ve not demonstrated that in my responses. It’s difficult to do here.

                • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
                  31·
                  3 months ago

                  Based on this interaction I’ve realized my perception of lemmygrad is hypocritical: My experience indicates that our shallow, automated and wide scope language analysis likely isn’t human truth. I’ve decided to spend more time there.

                  Thank you for risking good faith engagement when it’s not popular or politic. Iron sharpens iron.