• anivia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Or you could just get a Moto tag, which already supports Google FindMy and has centimeter accuracy thanks to UWB

    • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bluetooth seems to propagate down the product line faster than UWB, so for people who wants budget devices but also have more accurate tracking functions, this might be better.

      • anivia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Some phones have UWB. Zero phones have Bluetooth 6.0

          • xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It’s not a joke. UWB adoption could easily stay ahead of Bluetooth 6 adoption. There’s nothing requiring phone manufacturers to always update to the latest Bluetooth, just like there’s still not very many 5G mmWave phones available.

            It could go either way. Bluetooth 6 might be more familiar for manufacturers to implement, but if the hardware is different to support the accuracy, who knows?

            • potustheplant@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              “easily”? Please, name one device that has UWB and doesn’t include bluetooth.

              Besides, if this is included in 6.0 and assuming it does cost much more per chip, where’s the harm in having a better feature set? This seems like an incredibly pointless discussion.