There are a couple I have in mind. Like many techies, I am a huge fan of RSS for content distribution and XMPP for federated communication.

The really niche one I like is S-expressions as a data format and configuration in place of json, yaml, toml, etc.

I am a big fan of Plaintext formats, although I wish markdown had a few more features like tables.

  • MonkderVierte
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Does unicode have bold/italics/underline/headings/tables/

    Yes, and even 𝓈𝓉𝓊𝒻𝒻 𝕝𝕚𝕜𝕖 🅣🅷🅘🆂. And table lines & edges & co. are even already in ASCII.

    Isn’t that outside of its intended goal?

    🤷<- this emoji has at least 6 color variants and 3 genders.

    If not, how is markup unnecessary?

    Because the editor could place a 𝗯𝗼𝗹𝗱 instead of a **bold**, which is a best-case-scenario with markdown support btw. And i just had to escspe the stars, which is a problem that native unicode doesn’t pose.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      What about people who prefer to type **bold** rather than type a word, highlight it, and find the Bold option in whichever textbox editor they happen to be using?

      • MonkderVierte
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Which is what i ask for, better (or at all) support for unicode character variations, including soft keyboards.
        Imagine, there was a switch for bold, cursive, etc on your phone keyboard, why would you want to type markup?
        And nobody would take **bold** away, if you want to write that.

          • MonkderVierte
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            You always find some excuses, huh? That would be a bug.

            • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Always? That’s my first reply. Bug of what? A flaired character has a different code than a standard one, so your files would be incompatible with any established tools like find or grep.

              • MonkderVierte
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                My bad, confused you with someone else.

                You can always update them.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Would you have to do that for every letter? I suppose a “bold-on/bold-off” character combination would be better/easier, and then you could combine multiple styles without multiplying the number of glyphs by some ridiculous number.

          Anyways, because markup is already standardized, mostly. Having both unicode and markup would be a nightmare. More complicated markup (bulleted lists, tables) is simpler than it would be in Unicode. And markup is outside of Unicode’s intended purpose, which is to have a collection of every glyph. Styling is separate from glyphs, and has been for a long time, for good reason. Fonts, bold/italics/underline/strikethrough, color, tables and lists, headings, font size, etc. are simply not something Unicode is designed to handle.

          • MonkderVierte
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Would you have to do that for every letter? I suppose a “bold-on/bold-off” character combination would be better/easier,

            Yeah, had the same thought, edited already.