GoDaddy really lived up to its bad reputation and recently changed their API rules. The rules are simple: either you own 10 (or 50) domains, you pay $20/month, or you don’t get the API. I personally didn’t get any communication, and this broke my DDNS setup. I am clearly not the only one judging from what I found online. A company this big gating an API behind such a steep price… So I will repeat what many people said before me (being right): don’t. use. GoDaddy.

  • thejevans
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sounds good. Better free DNS option with API support?

    • loudwhisper@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Desec.io is a good option. To be honest using cloudflare just for DNS is completely OK. It’s not a service that allows spying on you or consolidates their monopoly.

      • thejevans
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It does, but for the same reason as what happened to OP, it’s best to separate DNS from domain registrar.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Don’t use DNS like that. Use a VPS and route traffic to a isolated network at home if need be

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        ?? Your solution to dynamic dns is to run all the traffic through a static IP vps? Are you paying for this VPS, or are you saying you trust the host more than you trust cloudflare, because they give you a free VPS?

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Safer is a matter of opinion. You’re moving your trust from one company to another, that doesn’t necessarily equate more safety. How do you trust the safety of companies?

            As for less fragile, that is patently untrue. You have all the same failure points as previous, but now must manage the update schedule of another server, and have the added reliance on a third party host. You’ve increased fragility if anything.

      • thejevans
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s definitely a nice solution, but I have not had good luck with free VPS providers keeping the lights on. It would likely cost money on the order of $5 to $10 per month, so it is a different class of solution.