Bonus panel:

  • lugal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    In a way. I mean we know it exists, no one would reasonable deny it, but the exact mechanism are still debated. How much is beneficial adaptation, how much is genetic drift for example. But the common ancestry is as common sense as that an apple will fall to earth

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I thought it was pretty well accepted that it’s basically “Genetic defects happen, sometimes they don’t prevent reproduction and pass down to the next generation, then it’s a lottery, maybe it will last, maybe it won’t, maybe it’s beneficial, maybe it isn’t 🤷”

      Maybe at some point a human was born with knees that would never wear out but they died before having the chance to reproduce from being eaten by a tiger, we’ll never know!

      • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        bacteria and some others, preparing for horizontal gene transfer: “im about to ruin man(kind)'s whole career”

    • Poogona [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah the real issue in a way is that there’s just so much evidence of evolution happening that it’s hard to find a single shared pattern to study

      • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The pioneers in some fields are calling for studying (or renaming it) INvolution as opposed to evolution, as it has much to do with involved interactions with other life forms (bacterial, fungal).