Source

I see Google’s deal with Reddit is going just great…

  • WhatIsH2O4
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s often the same for science, though there are actual experts who occasionally weigh in too.

    • Joe Cool
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      You can usually detect those by the number of downvotes.

      • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not really. A lot of surface level correct, but deeply wrong answers, get upvotes on Reddit. It’s a lot of people seeing it and “oh, I knew that!” discourse.

        Like when Reddit was all suddenly experts on CFD and Fluid Dynamics because they knew what a video of laminar flow was.

        • Joe Cool
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s what I meant. I have seen actual M.D.s being downvoted even after providing proof of their profession. Just because they told people what they didn’t want to hear.
          I guess that’s human nature.

          • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            I get you. Didn’t mean to come across as a “that guy”. So completely agree with you. The laminar flow Reddit shit infuriated me because I have my masters in Mech Eng and used to do a lot of CFD. People were talking out of their ass on “I know laminar flow!”

            Well, see, it’s more than that. It’s not just a visual thing and…

            “Ahhhh! I know laminar flow! Downvote the heretic!”

    • TheOakTree@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      My least favorite is when people claim a deep understanding while only having a surface-level understanding. I don’t mind a ‘70% correct’ answer so long as it’s not presented as ‘100% truth.’