I don’t count productivity or coding as a net good for what it’s worth. Fun, sure, but it’s truly incredible how the influx of AI hasn’t been used to create a more efficient way to distribute resources irl

Tech bros are a scourge on humanity and I truly wish for nothing but the worst for them

  • queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I don’t see why an AI couldn’t be trained on specifically non-Western/counter-cultural/marginalized art. It seems trivial?

    The bigger problem I see is that it can never make anything truly new, which is why it’s important for artists to keep making new art. I just think that AI, as a tool used carefully by artists to enhance their work or to take shortcuts on repetitive work, is fine.

    As you said, companies are happy with AI goop that’s “good enough” and do not care about art, but that’s not the technologies fault.

    EDIT Well wait, no, actually the way the plagiarism machine seeks to reduce all artwork into data points is also kind of bad since there’s no mechanism to force these AI companies to actually compensate artists.

    • EelBolshevikism [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I don’t see why an AI couldn’t be trained on specifically non-Western/counter-cultural/marginalized art. It seems trivial?

      Sorry, let me clarify. The issue isn’t the art it’s being trained on, but the fact that the artist can’t (currently) input their own personal opinions and thoughts. You can train it on countercultural art, but you can’t, like, specifically depict every aspect of how you personally view that art’s depiction of, say, a cat, so it sort of stays “stuck” on the level of simply depicting the average cat in the art it was trained on. It can’t actually go through the art cycle of interpretation -> reinterpretation -> etc etc on the granular level traditional art can, instead being limited on only doing this on the abstract level of the prompts (which aren’t the end product anyways, so doing reinterpretations of them based on your own opinion is counterintuitive at best and at worst will not result in any sort of reinterpretation in the final product at best).

      This is all a way for me to overexplain the fact that it cannot accept granular input based on the user’s subjective experience. This a huge limitation for it and, I would be willing to bet that if we fixed it, it would stop looking as much like art generators and more like how custom music synthesizer creation works or something. The AI would stop being an artist and start being a brush, basically.