@Waffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 1 month agoIf we had partieslemmy.worldimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1426arrow-down121
arrow-up1405arrow-down1imageIf we had partieslemmy.world@Waffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 1 month agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-square@CaptainBasculinlink5•1 month agoYou can technically install dpkg onto arch; but it’s not reccomended.
minus-square@renzev@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink16•1 month agoSpeaking of not recommended, you can technically install arch on an NTFS partition
minus-squareSandbaglinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 month agoWhy? This seems cool and everything but why would you do this, just to say I can?
minus-squareAndromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼linkfedilink5•1 month agoI have no idea, just came across it on GitHub one day and found it pretty funny. It seems to be pretty unstable though.
You can technically install dpkg onto arch; but it’s not reccomended.
Speaking of not recommended, you can technically install arch on an NTFS partition
You can also install Windows on btrfs
Why?
This seems cool and everything but why would you do this, just to say I can?
I have no idea, just came across it on GitHub one day and found it pretty funny. It seems to be pretty unstable though.
I can smell data loss issues just by reading this