The more pro-Israel people call everything that doesn’t match their beliefs antisemitism, the less antisemitism means to everyone else

Wankclown brings to my mind an image of Pennywise on meth

Is this a screen shot from a third party twitter client circa 2009?

Theory without application is often the entire point in certain academic circles and if someone comes along and finds a practical use for their mathematically based philosophical musings they delve deeper looking for the pureness

Like our ancestors with goat entrails and a magic talking stick.

So true. My daughter saw TayTay on the Eras tour and all she does now is quote Das Kapital

And that noise you hear is the sound of software developers everywhere sobbing

All I saw was an elderly (he’s 62 - that not middle aged) cultist trying to look cool and it was as sad as that sounds. Then having the Red Hot Chiili Peppers, led by “Just For Men” sponsored Anthony Keidis, started to make me think that Michael Johnson inclusion was because he was going to compete in the 2028 Olympics.

He’s partly right. A lot of people think Net Zero means doing something about carbon emissions when it really means paying someone to pretend your doing something about emissions

lastwagen

Sure they might have threads accounts but I haven’t seen either of them directly involved with the rest of the fediverse. So I’d hardly say ‘heavy into’

Sagen Maddalena ruined this meme about 5 hours ago

In layman’s terms tech bros are so far up their own arses they think they are the main characters in a Robert Anton Wilson novel

2012! Did they not watch Moonfall, it made 2012 look like Shakespeare.

You can cling to that and trust Recorder.

I’ll avoid both like the plague and sit by smugly when the “we accidentally sent it to the cloud” press release is published

Holy privacy invasion Batman!

“we are not casting a vote for a genocidal piece of shit.”

That’d be a great sentiment if not voting was going to actually help stop the genocide.

Well that was a horror show to read.

This is quite the quandary. Do I reply with lesser known spin-offs or do I answer the question that’s impossible to answer honestly?