• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The test, which was conducted in a tunnel of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS), used chemicals, high-explosives and radiotracers to “validate new predictive explosion models,” the department said.

    The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty was adopted in 1996 by the United Nations General Assembly.

    Russian President Vladimir Putin first announced on October 5 that Russia may abandon the nuclear test ban treaty.

    On Tuesday, Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin said on his Telegram channel that Moscow was withdrawing from the treaty because of the “irresponsible attitude” of the U.S. to global security.

    “In the interests of ensuring the security of our country, we are withdrawing the ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty,” said Volodin, adding that while Moscow had ratified the nuclear test ban treaty in 2000, Washington had failed to do so because of its “irresponsible attitude to global security issues.”

    Last month, Mikhail Kovalchuk, an ally of the Russian president, proposed that Moscow test its nuclear weapons at a nuclear test site in Novaya Zemlya, an Arctic Ocean archipelago, “at least once” to scare the West.


    The original article contains 519 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 65%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    More “Politics” than “World News”. I’ll leave it unlocked for now. Reading it, it feels like a reaction by the US to a policy move by the Duma.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Story is still pretty much the same, Russia walks back support on a nuclear arms treaty, US responds with a nuclear test. Really more of a story (and a good one!) for Politics. It’s too US centric for World News.

        • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, you are right, similar.

          Either way I think people know Bloomberg more than Newsweek.

          It seems I need to make sure more is mentioned on other country instead of just seeing two countries mentioned=world news

          • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m of a mind that any time nuclear weapons policy changes, it’s world news. Call it mutually assured headlines.