• voidavoid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Or y’know, lack of sex if that’s yr thing

    edit: someone out here doesn’t understand that aces exist

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Literally almost everyone who has money naturally has a high P value

        Trust fund babies talking about how hard they’ve worked is a meme for a reason

        I bet there’s some interesting analysis that could prove that p can be partially defined by m

        • riodoro1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I knew this would come up, and you are absolutely right. But apart of the bourgeoisie who really have some parts of their brains wired differently, us “normal” people even if we are successful we suffer from imposter syndrome or burn out.

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I dunno. With enough money, “yes men” can be employed to tell me how much I deserve to be the boss, and books I’m uncomfortable with can be removed from my local library. /s

        Edit: But I would never do that. Simple delusions of grandeur are easier to achieve and have fewer network externalities.

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s the short form equation that ignores environmental pressure, the long form has a separate term that accounts for shelter and sentience as a factor between 0 and 1, as well as a quotient for empathy with a numerator of associate happiness.

  • cbarrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Bellman Equation describes a “principle of optimality" for decision making.

    Essentially, choose the action that maximizes your expected future “value.” The problem is how you choose your value function, and how you estimate the outcomes of your actions.

    Image of the Bellman Equation from Wikipedia

  • NeuronautML
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems to me this is more like the equation that maximizes happiness for people who don’t have the mentioned things.

    Plenty of people have food, money and sex, rightfully obtained from their perception, yet are still very unhappy, even suicidal. This is what you think you need. It’s not even necessarily what you need.

  • LegionEris [she/her]@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh I definitely need some strife. It can just be me vs situation like my current position trying to run an efficient dispensary, but I need the challenge way more than the perception of earning or owning. I gotta be solving problems and completing tasks. I can’t live idly.

  • Dr_Decoy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is the word “from” missing from the equation explanation? Should it be “… that you have earned FROM the first three?”

  • banana_meccanica@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Perception is the hardest that destroy the equation. All have their personal own, there isn’t a universal right perception, common is living a lie to keep going.