AMD has made an oversight in implementing their new technology that poses a significant issue for Counter Strike 2 players who have opted to utilize AMD’s AntiLag+. Recently, AMD introduced a new 23.10.1 driver allowing players to access this technology in the game. However, it has now been confirmed that utilizing this technology can lead to a ban.

Despite Counter Strike 2 being launched just this month, it has already earned attention from all major GPU manufacturers, each offering dedicated graphics drivers. AMD’s most recent release introduced Anti-Lag+, an exclusive feature for the Radeon RX 7000 series, aimed at enhancing responsiveness by optimizing frame alignment within the game’s code.

It has been discovered that manipulating DLL functions with AMD’s technology could result in a VAC ban. Valve may consider lifting the bans only when AMD provides an update for this technology. Until that happens, it is recommended not to enable this technology in the game.

The Anti-Lag+ technology is an improved tech that only works on Radeon RX 7000 series and RDNA3 based products. The tech is available in multiple games but Counter Strike 2 is the only that has reported problems with implementation. The game also supports NVIDIA Reflex technology, but Unlike Anti-Lag+ which works on a driver level, Reflex is incorporated into the game itself.

Tweet from @CounterStrike:

"AMD’s latest driver has made their “Anti-Lag/+” feature available for CS2, which is implemented by detouring engine dll functions.

If you are an AMD customer and play CS2, DO NOT ENABLE ANTI-LAG/+; any tampering with CS code will result in a VAC ban.

Once AMD ships an update we can do the work of identifying affected users and reversing their ban. @AMD"

  • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It has been discovered that manipulating DLL functions with AMD’s technology could result in a VAC ban.

    So actively altering game code can be misconstrued as trying to cheat. Well consider me fucking shocked.

    • Dudewitbow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Things like reshade and controller api modifcations redirect dll functions. The line is kind of vague about the specifics.

      Should people on steamdeck ironically be banned for how proton changes how the DX11 is read and converts it to vulkan?

      • Vilian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Should people on steamdeck ironically be banned for how proton changes how the DX11 is read and converts it to vulkan?

        it’s just converting the call that the game make to vulkan, it’s different, it don’t touch game code at all

        • Dudewitbow
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Its not exactly, its a dll conversion. You overtake the dll the game uses and replace it with a different library. Same idea with reshade. You bypass the dll given by the game to use your own.

  • Gabu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    And yet use of actual cheats doesn’t result in VAC bans, and the game is in just as bad of a state as CS:GO, with most old cheats being easily ported over. Good fucking job…

    • dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not even purely just a CS/Valve issue, which is the worst part. Anything that runs BattlEye struggles with rampant unpunished cheating, and yet they successfully ban anyone running legit systems, or software that has nothing to do with the game. Somehow it’s only getting worse, because a bunch of new games are introducing Ring0 anticheats, that have access to way too much information, but still fail to do what they’re designed to

      • Dym Sohin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        still fail to do what they’re designed to

        they were designed to create chinese botnet, and they will

        «anti-cheat» is the same as «anti-terror» — a gift-paper wrapper

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s of course easier to ban something that modifies game files without hiding it, than it is to ban something that tries its very best to hide its very existence.

    • XTornado
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      It does results in bans of course but they sadly don’t catch up with cheaters fast enough… Or in some cases is difficult to catch on without the crazy anticheats we have seen complains about.

          • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean its like saying we can cure HIV through genocide

            SURE it’ll work, but it doesn’t mean the nuclear solution is the best possible solution that exists and ever will exist yk

      • hackitfast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not sure why people are downvoting you. I’ve been in about 2 Valorant games where I’ve seen people straight up get banned mid-match. It terminated the match immediately.

        On top of that, I’ve never seen obvious cheaters in Valorant. Go play Counter-Strike for long enough and you’ll find spin bots.

        Is rootkit anti-cheat sketchy? Absolutely. Does it work really fucking well? Absolutely.

        • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think he’s being downvoted purely because of “iNvASiVe AntIcHeAt” being capitalised like that. It’s needlessly hostile.

          I think he’s right, or at least adding to the discussion, people just don’t like the tone.

    • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Professional players should all be using the same hardware and software configuration

      VAC is to keep the game fun for more casual players

      • kick_out_the_jams@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Professional players should all be using the same hardware and software configuration

        This would be a serious challenge in real-life and basically impossible online.
        You’re bound to encounter minor model differences unless you spend dramatically more on hardware.

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean… professionals always have to spend dramatically more on hardware…

          There are rules around the engines and bodies f1 and nascar drivers can use, there are rules around what shoes runners can use…

          A slimmed down operating system on a specific hardware configuration isn’t unreasonable

          • DauntingFlamingo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’d buy in to that. You could even do it the way NASCAR does it: here are the specs. You can buy it from us to guarantee you are in compliance, or if you’re good enough to replicate this setup you can use your own, but we’ll tear down your setup to inspect after every contest. The only changes allowed are peripherals

        • Dudewitbow
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Irl professionals dont use their own pc. They use a pc provided to them, and their own accessories thats tested before hand for any suspicious modifications.

          Online of course is unenforcable

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Real sports let you change the source code

      Football

      Rugby

      Cricket

      Basketball

      Hockey

      Are all open source; it’s not that esports aren’t sports. It’s just most are advertisements not sports

  • falcunculus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The game also supports NVIDIA Reflex technology, but Unlike Anti-Lag+ which works on a driver level, Reflex is incorporated into the game itself.

    This shows how Nvidia’s size and money allow it to improve its market position without necessarily having better tech. They may sign deals with game developers to implement Nvidia-exclusive features rather than have to tamper with DLLs and such.

    • Bythe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or…you know… they actually provide a SDK for devs to implement it (unli’e AMD).

      • falcunculus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not sure what you mean, obviously they must provide some bindings for developers to actually use their product.

        But it’s not enough to offer a solution — you need to get people to use it. Doing it this way means Nvidia has to go out and convince studios to spend the effort, provide assistance if necessary, etc — which plays to its strengths as market leader, because it doesn’t require their product to be better, it “just” requires more employees and business contacts.

        AMD, being smaller, instead goes for a riskier lower-level approach that needs less contact with developers, hopefully side-stepping the need to extend resources to drive adoption, because games get the feature “for free”.