• fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    epicenter

    I do not think it means what you think it means.

    • Tocano
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Epicentre - (formal) the central point of something

      edit: spelling

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The epicenter is not the center; it’s a point above the center. It’s from seismology. An earthquake’s origin is beneath the earth’s surface. The epicenter is the point on the surface that’s directly above the origin point.

        • Tocano
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, it is used like that. However, not just in english, but in many languages, epicentre is sometimes used with the meaning of “centre of something”.

  • Spzi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People in here seem to question why it’s not the North, being responsible for the vast majority of emissions.

    Rich countries have factories and cars, but also a technological standard and environmental regulations. Both limit the amount of air pollution (think dust particles) while greenhouse gases (like CO2) are something else.

    Now think of a poor country with low regulations and old technology. People in slums burn literal dirt in their ovens. While they contribute almost nothing to climate change, air quality reflects the quality of fuels, ovens, engines and regulations. It’s poor.

    This is just a general take. I opened the article, but immediately closed it due to popups and eyesore.

    • DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You see it with everything from food quality, cigarettes, fuel. The standards set in the West prevent so much random shit we never acknowledge.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the global south? I’m looking at a map and it seems that the global north is the epicenter of poor air quality.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      From the article, they are mentioning the Northern countries of India and Bangladesh and the equatorial country of the Congo (DRC)

      I expected a bit more Argentina, South Africa and Australia if we’re gonna be talking about the south.

      But I guess they mean the third world countries, but that headline has been repeated too much already. And someone harked back to the cold war period and discovered global south used to be a synonym for the third world. (Because the third world had a lower average latitude than the first and second world).

  • stepan@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still don’t understand why not USA / Canada, where cars are very common

    • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Non-CO2 pollutants are side products of combustion. A cleaner combustion reduces their amount. Cleaner combustion occurs in healthy, well engineered engines with the help of clean catalytic converters. It means that new and expansive cars are less pollutant.

      That’s why. Usa and Canada have better cars

    • query@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is, but coal is cheap, when you only look at what it costs before you set it on fire.