But what if you do? Will you get caught?

  • teft@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s publicly accessible it’s scrape-able. He already tried to make tweets not publicly accessible and look how long that lasted.

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not even clear that it’s illegal to scrape publicly available data, so I don’t know what the TOS would be enforcing.

    • Kuro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yep, would never remember on the odd occasions I would look at Twitter, then just leave the site after being prompted to login

  • Lettuce eat lettuce
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol this has the same energy as those NFT idiots crying about people taking screenshots of their stupid monkeys.

    Noooo, stop scraping my dataaaa!

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope someone makes some manic bot that scrapes every last tweet and posts it on a duplicate site call Y

  • underisk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure both parties must agree to the terms before they legally bind anyone so wouldn’t this just apply to logged in users?

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t have to enforce it. If someone says bad things about Twitter by analysing their content, Twitter can sue them scraping.

  • 7fb2adfb45bafcc01c80@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I thought this was an article about the X Windows system based on the preview for the article. Boy are those two similar-looking.

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    When Elon bought Twitter I was hopeful- I strongly believe the world needs an open, free-speech based, ‘public square’. The problem with the Internet right now is many ‘public squares’ are privately owned, and those private companies cater to advertisers more than users.

    Sadly I don’t think it’s worked out that well. I think Twitter is probably better off than they were, but you can’t have a public square without openness. And while Twitter/X is now more free, it’s also less open.

    • ruckblack@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      “more free” my dude people who pay $8 per month get their replies boosted up above everyone else. What are you talking about?

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        More free in that the moderation doesn’t have a bias. I think any bias is harmful, be it Left or Right leaning. I much prefer the current approach of fact checking posts with community notes over hiding posts that are deemed undesirable.

        • Revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didn’t our little Free Speech Absolutist™️ ban the “slurs” cis and cisgender while also banning folks who misgender cis folks while supporting those who do the same to trans folks? (To say nothing of the removal of lots and lots of other legal speech that he did not like. If that’s what unbiased looks like to you, I think that you may want to examine your own biases.