AI bots are so good at mimicking the human brain and vision that CAPTCHAs are useless - The bots’ accuracy is up to 15% higher than that of humans::The bots’ accuracy is up to 15% higher than that of humans

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sick of trying to guess random things about American culture.

    “Click in all the school bus” it says. How? If it’s blue is it a school bus, or is it only the yellow ones that are the school buses, I don’t know.

  • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly sick of captchas. Think because I’m using Firefox with adblockers. I get them anytime I try to visit a site. It’s basically making using the Internet a slog.

    I’d start creating bots to do them for me. Fucking life

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    AI bots are not good at mimicking the human brain and vision, they’re just good at object recognition

  • Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wasn’t that the entire point of the captcha? It was never intended as a permanent solution. They help train AIs to identify objects and patterns.

    • lunarul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That was definitely not the original point of the captcha. It used to be every site implementing their own version, some better than others, but all were just solving something that should be easy for humans and almost impossible for bots. But then Google got the idea of using it for crowdsourcing to help with digitizing books and they launched reCAPTCHA. This was easy to embed on any web page and served a noble purpose, so it quickly became the de facto captcha over much of the web. Fast forward several years and now we’re all providing free work in training AI object recognition, a problem AI is already very good at, which means the images we’re being given are increasingly more difficult for humans to interpret.

  • pulaskiwasright
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Those image captchas are useless. “Prove you’re a human by identifying bicycles exactly the same as our AI identified them.” Of course an AI is better than a human at identifying them the same way as an AI.

    • cosmicboi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s silly, because you can just cycle between captchas until you find one you can actually do

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    So can an AI tell me if a traffic light pole is part of the traffic light or not. Because I never really was sure.

  • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Completely unsurprising given that the millions of captchas people have been doing for the past like 15 years have been being used to train the AIs…

  • Cloudless ☼@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Recently I’ve seen captchas with AI-generated images. Like “click pictures with a panda in a flower pot”.

    If the image is generated by AI, it must be easier for AI to identify right?

  • maniajack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    H̶͉͙̔̂o̶̱͗͝w̶͍̒̍ ̴̳͚͗̄d̵͚̀o̵̧̿ ̵̳̜̔y̷̰̅o̴̗͛͜ù̸̢̘̿ ̶̟̎̐v̴̠͊e̵͕̅̒r̷̝̓̄i̴̮̕f̷̤͉̉ŷ̷̡̐ ̶̗͚̿a̴̡̫̔ ̵̩̉͝p̶̺͝è̶̼͍̈r̴̜͗̚š̴̡͇o̷̘̜͆n̶̫͛ ̶̢̒͘i̶̢̖͆s̸͖̕ ̴͓̇͜r̵̬̞̒̂ẹ̷̡̐̑a̶͓̗͋l̵̹̓̿,̵̫͛͝ ̶̞̝̍̃w̸̞̙̄̕h̵̡̖̄͛a̵̖͖͆̈́t̴̲̐̎ ̷̳̀į̶̳̍s̶̝͈̓̌ ̵̘͍̓̎r̸͋͒ͅe̴͕̰͑͋a̷͍̮͊l̵͕̄