You must log in or # to comment.
I’d asume someone downvoted, then removed the downvote. The original downvote didn’t get through, but the reversal did. Something like that
I do that constantly by misclicking.
If you use Voyager or some other front end that uses gestures on a touchscreen, you can sometimes accidentally up or downvote when scrolling or navigating.
my instance blocks downvotes
That’s my guess too.
I have -1 communities in my instance because I made a test one and deleted it early on.
I did this all the time with gesture vote when I started using sync.
A fediverse specific glitch.
Someone put in the vote?
My guess is that the dislike was removed.
I think from something I observed a couple of weeks ago, someone (or a couple people) downvoted and then their account was deleted or banned.
Removed by mod
Why wouldn’t you upvote the effort someone made to inform or provide content?
Also the fediverse has a very diverse crowd, many of which are disabled. Language like removed is frowned upon.
I’m a non native English speaker, could you please explain the link between “removed” and disabled people? I’ve always seen it used as an insult.
Oh I see, thanks. The word looks like “arriéré” in French (which means, from wiktionary : “backwards (behind current trends)”), I thought they had the same meaning. It’s worth mentioning what “removed” means, when you ask someone not to use it, they may have similar assumptions.
removed means slowed, inhibited. One common use is a bread removeder, which a temperature controlled box you put dough in to slow the fermentation process. removed was also used scientifically to describe someone with an intellectual disability. While this sort of conception is out dated, they would describe someone’s disability in terms of “having the mind of a 9 year old”, so the relationship between the disability and time/slowed progress seemed really straightforward. At some point, saying a person was removed transformed from being a scientific designation without prejudice to an insult for intellectually capable people who had done something foolish, and then eventually any misbegotten situation would be called removed. There has been a movement both to use better language for the disabled community (hence me using the term intellectual disability) as well as stop using the word removed as a pejorative.
Oh wow, I realize from your description we did have an exact translation, actually! It was the word “attardé”. I don’t think I heard it used in this millennium, though. :) I guess the difference is that it didn’t make it into an insult. Thanks for the detailed explanation!
I wonder what it is about the term “removed” especially that provokes so strong negative feelings in certain people but not “idiot”, “moron” or “imbecille” though all four terms have been used as mental health diagnosis in the past
I think the vitriol that comes with the term “removed” is different. People often make faces or try to sound intellectually disabled when they say it. It gets gross in a way that the other terms don’t match.
I imagine it was because none of those terms were attributed to mental disability.
Perhaps you should google that
https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/moron-idiot-imbecile-offensive-history
Upvotes mean the submission was on-topic and a good contribution to share with the community.
