• cdf12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s worth watching the whole video, AOC is the type of politician that actually has a chance to have a party that represents the working class.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I hope the Democrats can figure out before the last minute that she’s a really viable candidate for President.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        69
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most D’s are captured by most of the same corporations and oligarchs as the R’s. They will never allow a working class movement. Only corporate-removed lite.

        • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          If so, they are in for hard wake-up call. Most corporations/oligarchs are rapidly shifting their allegiance to Trump. Those sweet donations will stop flowing to Dems.

          • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            Perhaps this is one of the reasons why the Dems are also shifting right: to capture back corporate donors, instead of listening to the wants and needs of their base.

            Welcome to Democratic neoliberalism.

            • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Yes I think that’s possible, but it’s a strategy that will surely fail. They cannot very well pass the GOP on the right, and they cannot out-Trump Trump. The 2024 election has shown that there were insufficient moderate voters. The upcoming cycle will teach the Dems that there are now also insufficient moderate donors.

              Only chance to win is to go towards economic populism, and with Trumps billionaire cabinet it has never been easier.

      • Elon_Musk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        My micropenis submarine has already banned AOC from X.com because I saved drowning underaged malaysian soccer players from the pedos in the so-called british special forces.

      • moon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        They know she’s popular enough to win a general election one day, just as they knew Bernie was. But the moderate crowd would rather lose with one of their own than win with a progressive

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I mean AOC might become president, that isn’t gonna magically get progressive policies passed. You still need 218 US congressional districts to also elect progressives.

          Edit: And also 50 sentors

          • AngryMob@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Maybe. Republicans don’t have this issue though, it sorta remains to be seen for dems.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        No she’s not. She is a women and Americans well not vote for a woman for president. Sorry it is the truth and they have to stop doing that.

      • flowque
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Saying “proof” is not enough here. Can you elaborate?

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’re asking for proof of billionaire political capture? How about superdelegates, or the billionaires on stage at the DNC, or the Democrats bending the knee to AIPAC by pushing out AOC?

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      She’s in a tough spot because she dislikes a lot of what the Democratic party is doing and also refuses to even meet with lobbyists let alone take their money. To a ton of everyday people these are very good things but to either of the parties this is an enemy to the party that doesn’t have the firepower to win an election. Of course, I would absolutely love to be wrong on this but history (especially recently) is not on her side.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        In the 2020 primary Bernie and Warren were regularly leading in donations. And in 2016 and 2024 Trump won despite raising less money throughout most of the campaign. Big money is not the be all and end all of politics, and when people believe in a candidate large sums can be raised.

    • EmpireInDecay
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      She’s is a fucking sheepdog, that’s all she is. Giving disenfranchised voters the illusion that if they stick around long enough, they too can have a seat at their table. She’s a snake in the grass that cannot be trusted.

      • AngryMob@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        With this attitude you must trust absolutely 0 politicians i guess? Where do you go from there?

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m with you. I mean I agree with their sentiment and I think AOC is the same as the rest. She is after all a part of the machine.

          That said, it’s worth distinguishing the difference between trust and hope. I always hope.

  • Sticky Fedi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Listen, they’re going to try to get that third term, but they’ll ultimately fail, and the only point of this presidency is to give Trump’s donors as much favour as he can, as the CIA collects dossiers on all of them so that Trump can retire as the new Epstein.

    Worst part about it? They’re going to fuck shit up and republicans will fit DECADES claim he was one of the best presidents ever.

    Alexa, remind me of this post in 10 years.

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Very true, but it’s not like Harris was signaling she was going to eliminate billionaires by seizing all of their wealth. So both parties are the same, right?