• TikoBrown@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I love Bernie, he is one of my favorite politicians but thinking he would have won is fantasy just like Kamala was. Do you know why Obama won twice? because he has charisma, the “it” factor like a superstar. Something some people are born with, it’s like they vibrate with an energy that many people gravitate towards.

    Sadly and I hate to admit it, but Rump has “it”, I know it’s a shitty evil version but even some good people were blinded by it (although this has shown me there are a lot more stupid/evil people in this country than I imagined)

    Politics is mostly a popularity contest sadly instead of policy, they should really call it Poplitics. I believe there is one among us who will rise up sometime in the next four years with this gift to continue the never ending universal fight of good versus evil if we don’t all die in a Nuclear Armageddon or civil war by then.

    p.s. The DNC needs to burn to the ground and the ashes need to be vaporized.

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I’m usually the one defending the Democrats against whatever accusation, and I completely approve this message. It’s the 2016 DNC’s fault, and a lot of them are still around making equally bad and corrupt decisions.

    The difference being that it takes the standpoint, “We need to take over the Democrats or make something better, so the world doesn’t burn.” It’s the similar but very different standpoint, “It’s the Democratic Party’s fault that the world is burning and I’m not helping until they get better” that is unhelpful.

    Edit: https://lemmy.world/post/21721606

  • hedge@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t know for certain if he would have won, but I’m guessing that he would’ve done a whole heckuva lot better than Kamala.

    • DdCno1@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I doubt that. He wasn’t even able to convince Democrats beyond young, white colleges educated men - who are outraged by the mere thought that his appeal starts and ends with them, who dive head first into conspiracy theories that have one thing in common: They all ignore this simple fact.

      Look, he’s among a small handful of truly incorruptible American politicians and he deserves respect for this, but he has never been presidential material and never will be.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You think his appeal is only to white college educated men? What a fucking wild take.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Bernie would have won the fuck out of 2016.

        Hillary almost won, and she had essentially nothing to bring beyond being blue, a lady, and continuing the status quo. On top of that she is too fake for politics, which is a high level of fakeness. Bernie would have been an upgrade to everyone who doesn’t work in DC.

        How he would have done as president, I have no idea. But he absolutely would have won.

      • iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Bernie certainly had/has more support than young, white, college educated men. In 2016, so many people from different ages and walks of life were at the two of his rallies I attended and basically all the people I knew voting blue were more interested in Bernie that Hillary.

        I see that he got shafted by media and the party more than he was not as popular.