Is Telegram really that bad and should i look more into it or is sticking to signal really the best option?

  • lemillionsocks@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    No encryption, no peace of mind

    People often bring this up as an issue with Telegram, however if you want large casual groupchats with easy syncing and access to bots this is how it has to be. The moment 3rd party bots enter the equation end to end encryption has a hole in it. Large numbers of people also cause the encryption to be moot if one of the people you invite in are saving their logs and such.

    Also while the default chats arent end to end encrypted, they are still encrypted. This isnt as as strong but it means your ISP isnt casually able to sniff around whatever youre sending.

  • flatbield@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Seems like crypto people do not like telegram because they rolled their own crypto. Often kind of a red flag. Counter is that I am not sure there is a known issue with it beyond the standard complaints.

    Not sure why you would choose Telegram over Signal. The one thing I do not like about signal is your phone number is your ID though.

  • bbbhltz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Telegram may disclose IP addresses and phone numbers to relevant authorities if you are a member of a confirmed terrorist organisation.

    • zzzzz@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And, if they can disclose in such cases, one should assume that they might disclose in any case.

  • Sir Gareth@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Matrix does exist. It has another level of “barrier for entry” but its probably the least worst option excluding network effect.