• Tar_alcaran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a LOT easier to get 10 people to cut 10% of their meat consumption than it is to get 1 person to cut 100% of it, and the results are exactly the same in the short term, and much better in the long term.

    • jennraeross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except no one can reliably cut 10% off their dietary animal products, because people are terrible at realizing what they eat, and extremely effective at justifying their own habits. Realistically, 10 people cutting their animal products by 10% is completely meaningless.

    • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      How about ten people cut 100%?

      All of this shit is just excuses for inexcusable behavior. We do not need to turn grass into protein anymore and we don’t even do that anymore. We feed them stuff humans can eat!

      From literally every angle - go vegan.

  • алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    imo it’s a logical (next) step for socialists to not only oppose the exploitation of us humans by ourselves, but our exploitation of all intelligent beings