- cross-posted to:
- northcarolina@lemmy.world
- nytimes@rss.ponder.cat
- cross-posted to:
- northcarolina@lemmy.world
- nytimes@rss.ponder.cat
Over the past 15 years, North Carolina lawmakers have rejected limits on construction on steep slopes, which might have reduced the number of homes lost to landslides; blocked a rule requiring homes to be elevated above the height of an expected flood; weakened protections for wetlands, increasing the risk of dangerous storm water runoff; and slowed the adoption of updated building codes, making it harder for the state to qualify for federal climate-resilience grants.
Those decisions reflect the influence of North Carolina’s home building industry, which has consistently fought rules forcing its members to construct homes to higher, more expensive standards, according to Kim Wooten, an engineer who serves on the North Carolina Building Code Council, the group that sets home building requirements for the state.
“The home builders association has fought every bill that has come before the General Assembly to try to improve life safety,” said Ms. Wooten, who works for Facilities Strategies Group, a company that specializes in building engineering. She said that state lawmakers, many of whom are themselves home builders or have received campaign contributions from the industry, “vote for bills that line their pocketbooks and make home building cheaper.”
You must log in or register to comment.
there are people who live in towns that have been completely washed away, and they’re still going to vote R
I am probably an asshole for saying this, but I wouldn’t doubt that the Hurricane affects R turnout in WNC. Liberal Asheville and Boone will probably recover a lot quicker to support the election than all the smaller R towns that were hit.
Their voters want fewer regulations. This is what that looks like.
Pointing out that elected officials did what they said they would do and pretending it’s because of campaign contributions isn’t going to change anything.
It’s almost like building regulations are there to protect the people at the cost of unscrupulous businesses.
But nah, regulations bad. Free market will reward builders that voluntarily do things right.
Suuuure.
I’m a civil engineer in asheville & see this first hand daily. It’s disgusting, land developers will compromise safety & environmental impacts at all costs to squeeze every penny they can get off the lot.
Damn, I’m a ME who does volunteer disaster response for hurricanes/floods in areas along the Gulf Coast, and I’d love to pick your brain.
control housing costs*maximize profit for corporate real estate investorsFixed the whitewashed title.
Cheap is expensive
Where’s the requisite Vimes quote about boots?
The other day I realized that there is a lot of cardboard in my brand name boots. Not the sole so I can’t feel the cobblestones.
Freedom I guess.
Housing is cardboarded enough of late. You get good windows and great insulation even as your walls/foundations crack within the first 5 years. (Popped into the private group for the new subdivision down the way at the edge of town…the pics and complaints are not pretty. Oh. And the land they built on. The construction people had to redo an entire road between houses with people already in them because water cracked that road and bubbled up through it.). This is going to be a regulations battle going forward. I don’t think we want less regulation on these cardboard subdivision houses.
Repubs are going to scream that DEMs are preventing houses from being built by keeping current regulations in place. While DEMs are like ya, safety, find another way. Run on the problem, don’t find solutions.
I am keen to hear about this federal land thing the VP candidates touched on.
Some contractors will do the right thing with or without regulation. But there are definitely a large number of assholes who will build only enough to pass an inspection, making regulations necessary.
