• qjkxbmwvz@startrek.websiteEnglish
    20·
    3 months ago

    Experimentalists: understood, say no more.

    Theorists: ok, show me the Hamiltonian…including the noise terms.

  • jet@hackertalks.comEnglish
    16·
    3 months ago

    Sources of error: psychosomatic popping noise interfered with measurements when viewing image

  • Engywuck@lemm.eeEnglish
    11·
    3 months ago

    Nah… It’s just that “usually calculations overestimate the experimental values”.

  • fckredditEnglish
    11·
    3 months ago

    Where was the experiment run? On a battlefield?

    • Droechai@lemm.eeEnglish
      11·
      3 months ago

      Setting up a bird listening device a few meters off an active runway and no filter for engine sounds.

      Play back is of course volume tuned for the bird chirps when processing data

  • Nooodel@lemmy.worldEnglish
    7·
    3 months ago
    • Hey boss, we have sincere troubles, SNR is off by too much.
    • how much?
    • 20dB
    • ah, then we’re good, that’s so ridiculous it’s def. a gain problem in your measurement setup
  • nothacking@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    1·
    3 months ago

    The funny thing about RF work is how casually a few orders of magnitudes gets thrown around. 10 dB fudge factors for assorted losses are quite common.