Here is the explanation: This is from a binary star system where one star is red, and the other is blue. Both stars are eclipsing the moon in the foreground, onto the planet in the background. In the areas where light from both stars falls, the planet looks as it normally would. In the upper-most circle the blue starlight is filtered out, but the red gets through. In the bottom circle the red light is filtered out, and only the blue gets through. In the center portion the light from both stars is blocked, so it gets no light.
Because this planet has no atmosphere, the shadows remain crisp along its surface.
I love this! It makes me wonder about all the phenomena that have never been seen or described due to different configurations of stars and planets. It would have never even occurred to me that a “double eclipse” could happen.
I know!! And to imagine being on the surface of that planet, as the different zones passed over you… It would look like dusk came suddenly (red), then night which only lasted a few minutes, then “morning” (blue). …Like getting an entire tiny day within the normal one!
What’s also interesting to note is that binary+ systems are the norm apparently, so something like this has to be way more common than what I’ve dumbly stumbled upon in the simulator!
Does the planet in question orbit one star at a time? I’d be curious to see if there’s ever an alignment condition where one half of the planet is bathed in blue light and the other half in red. Something like this (a clip I saved from a Processing project where I was learning about directional light):
That would be something to see!
I thought about this too… great use of that graphic! I bet you had no idea back then you’d be using it for this!
I had to remind myself that the two stars were also orbiting each other, so all of that would change periodically! The planet would have a “blue era” and a “red era” depending on which star was in front of the other. …Maybe?
Very nice, thanks for the explanation!
Now I wonder if
- this is physically possible (considering the constraints on distances etc)
- this naturally occurs somewhere out there
- we know of such an instance.
You’re welcome, and I agree!
@scarrexx@sh.itjust.works
