• bennel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nintendo issued an apology in 2020 over the issue, but argued that players who purchased the items were bound by the user agreement of the Nintendo Switch and thus ineligible to participate in a class action lawsuit against the company.

    I’m not a lawyer, but this seems suspicious. How would this work? If I purchase a product in a retail store, where exactly would I sign something agreeing to give up my eligibility to participate in a class action suit? Are they trying to argue that linking the hardware to your account carries over the restriction to any hardware used?

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      “You can’t all sue us” clauses need to be thrown out and criminally punished.

      EULAs in general are unenforceable bullshit. “By buying this object you agree to–” Nope! I can’t make a contract with an object. Certainly not with one I already bought and own.

    • Excel@lemmy.megumin.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Kinda dumb to do that when they already repair them for free (including shipping) with < 1 week turnaround.

          • AirDevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            You’re totally right. For some reason I (mis)remembered it only being in the EU while the US was excluded. I found the form on Nintendo’s website and will look into that later.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Kind of an asshole move towards whoever winds up with them.

      • CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would hope Nintendo is not using returned hardware for replacements. It happens accidentally in every job I’ve worked, but absolutely should not be the normal process.

        • Quexotic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          It is at Amazon, at least now. Twice I’ve gotten used for new. I’m not shopping there if I can possibly avoid it at this point.

        • optissima@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          They have been since at least 1999, when I recieved a refurbished GBC instead of my original GBC.