Shopify CEO promises to fight the request, calling the action ‘low-key overreach.’ Expert says data includes ‘everything the CRA needs to audit these businesses.’

    • sik0fewl@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s just an empty gesture towards their customers. Unless there’s actually something they can do to stop it.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s an overreach by the CRA, a fishing expedition. They can’t just ask for everyone’s information like that, and I won’t be surprised when they lose in court.

        Now, if any of these companies are truly under audit, then the CRA can get that information anyway. So either audit some of them that you suspect of tax evasion or leave shopify alone.

        Edit: also if they are more specific like we want the top 1000 earning businesses that might also work. It’s the blanket nature of the request that will be a problem.

        E.g see this one where a more specific agreement was settled on vs everyone. Only 5-10% ended up being handed over.

        https://blog.coinsquare.com/coinsquare-finalizes-agreement-with-cra-protects-majority-of-client-data/

        • terath@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t seem like an overreach to me. The CRA can ask for any tax related data they want. I’d think you’d actually want them to do this as it might might reporting taxes easier.

          All companies report employee income tax and now most people can just download that information from the CRA instead of having to enter it manually.

          If they were asking for non-tax related data that would be a problem.

          • settinmoon
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Except this is shopify’s customer’s data and not their own so the CRA should have to obtain a warrant before they can do that. If they’re allowed have free access to customer data just because it’s tax related then there’s nothing stopping law enforcement agencies to bypass the court system and obtaining any customer data on a massive scale, since they can always make up bogus reasons like “fighting crimes” or “monitor terrorist activities”.

  • CoffeeBot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In some ways I feel like this can be the CRA working with accounting software for better integration. If you’re running a side hustle you should be paying your taxes.

    That said I worry this is going to nab the person who maybe makes a few hundred a year selling shit online to subsidize their day job and they’re a lot easier of a target than a large operation commuting tax fraud; the CRA has a history of picking the former.

    • juusukun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A few hundred a year won’t make much difference, unless of course their main income already puts them into the top tax bracket, even then it’s gonna be less than $200

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They do. The wealthy are very aware of tax law and follow it to the letter, usually to their advantage, and thanks to the help of very astute tax professionals. Tax avoidance, infuriating as it is, is also usually legal

      If you want them to pay more, change the law, or at least vote for people who will.

  • lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t the BC gov try this with Alberta Costcos? They wanted Costco to hand over credit card receipts so they could charge PST on stuff purchased out of province.