- cross-posted to:
- security
- cross-posted to:
- security
Dude something fucking wild is brewing in cyber warfare. I can feel it in my news feed.
April has been wild so far, like 4 high profile vulnerabilities:
- xz - mostly impacted ssh
- Windows batch files
- php via glibc
- GitHub malware hosting
And now this. I’m probably missing some as well.
Yep, you forgot Palo Alto’s GlobalProtect telemetry allowing for remote code execution. A perfect 10.
China and Russia preparing to strike when election turmoil is ripe
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Hackers backed by a powerful nation-state have been exploiting two zero-day vulnerabilities in Cisco firewalls in a five-month-long campaign that breaks into government networks around the world, researchers reported Wednesday.
These devices are ideal targets because they sit at the edge of a network, provide a direct pipeline to its most sensitive resources, and interact with virtually all incoming communications.
Those characteristics, combined with a small cast of selected targets all in government, have led Talos to assess that the attacks are the work of government-backed hackers motivated by espionage objectives.
“Our attribution assessment is based on the victimology, the significant level of tradecraft employed in terms of capability development and anti-forensic measures, and the identification and subsequent chaining together of 0-day vulnerabilities,” Talos researchers wrote.
“Regardless of your network equipment provider, now is the time to ensure that the devices are properly patched, logging to a central, secure location, and configured to have strong, multi-factor authentication (MFA),” the researchers wrote.
It stems from improper validation of files when they’re read from the flash memory of a vulnerable device and allows for remote code execution with root system privileges when exploited.
The original article contains 533 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
ASAs are still way more prevalent than they should be when Palo Alto and others are much better options. Still, I’m glad I barely have to deal with them any more.
Palo Alto just had their own massive flaw exposed.
Oh yeah. They all do/will. But they are still better firewalls than ASAs.