HDMI Forum Rejects Open-Source HDMI 2.1 Driver Support Sought By AMD
www.phoronix.com

Oh, well fuck HDMI then

  • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
    44·
    10 months ago

    Hardware person here, these standards groups are getting out of control. They want thousands of dollars from anyone who wants to make anything compatible with their specs and while hardware and drivers are becoming cheaper and easier than ever to get into, they have become the main roadblock.

    It’s like the MP3 days all over again.

    • Tathar@pawb.social
      7·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, I wanted to implement HDMI on an FPGA dev board last year until I found out that I literally couldn’t without getting that license.

      • Draconic NEO@pawb.social
        2·
        10 months ago

        Isn’t it possible to make something that’s technically compatible with HDMI as long as you don’t call it HDMI, or say it uses HDMI. I’ve seen different projects go that route, maybe you might be able to as well.

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    35·
    10 months ago

    I’ve already started preferring displayport for monitors. Now I’m going to prefer monitors without HDMI at all, if they exist.

    Any TVs come with DP?

      • towerful@programming.dev
        20·
        10 months ago

        DP is by VESA, who brought you such bangers as VGA, DVI, standardised mounting systems, DDC (which enables EDID), EDID.
        Although there is controversy about them not supplying the standards documentation for free, i dont believe it is licences

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      8·
      10 months ago

      Some newer TVs come with DP over USB-C.

      There’s also the option of getting a DP to HDMI converter. I’m personally waiting for one that supports DP 2.0, along with VRR and HDR10+. There’s a DP 1.4 one right now, but AFAIK it uses DSC to display the full 4k120, which isn’t lossless.