Tucker Carlson did not ask Putin about how so many of his opponents wind up imprisoned and murdered, or the warrant the International Criminal Court has out for his arrest for war crimes in Ukraine.

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Tucker is a coward, a propagandist and a squidgy little estrogen stuffed dumpling.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      10 months ago

      I love the part where he goes shopping and compares the price of his basket to the price in the US, and it comes out to about 50% cheaper. What he doesn’t mention is that Russians bring in 10x less money a month than Americans do, which makes the cart much more expensive.

      Tucker knows this, he’s hoping the maga hats don’t

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        10 months ago

        I love that Tucker is astounded by the “push in a coin to unlock it” technology. That segment might have been one of the first dozen times he actually personally set foot in a supermarket.

      • Sylver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s not a bad thing just like you say, if he takes offense to it then that’s his problem :)

        Maybe he shouldn’t feel so insecure about his own sexuality then if he wants to attack others for it

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nobody expected him to ask tough questions. I don’t even think anyone expectet him to ask mediocre interesting ones. He was just a propaganda tool. And a cheap one, too.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you weren’t convinced by the interview, his overemotional gushing over the subway and grocery store tells you all you need to know about who’s knob he sucks.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It shows that Tucker is a removed for attention.

    The man is fucking loaded, he doesn’t need to do this job for the money - he does it because he’s a removed.

  • Deello@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I saw some clips of the interview and felt like I was watching the movie “The Interview”

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The former Fox News personality has drawn criticism for his recent interview with Vladimir Putin, which took place just days before opposition leader Alexei Navalny was found dead in a Russian penal colony.

    But over two hours, Tucker Carlson did not ask Putin about how so many of his opponents wind up imprisoned and murdered, or the warrant the International Criminal Court has out for his arrest for war crimes in Ukraine.

    But the clear implication of the video, scored with dreamy music and swelling strings, is that even though Vladimir Putin’s regime imprisons and kills political opponents, and invades neighboring countries without provocation, it’s all worthwhile because Moscow has an immaculate metro station.

    Many commentators compared Tucker Carlson’s enthusiasm for Moscow’s metro to the boast of Italians fascists of the 1930’s that Benito Mussolini “made the trains run on time” (a claim historians dispute).

    Field Marshall Grigory Potemkin was said to have built facades of phony, idyllic-looking villages along the route that Empress Catherine II took to Crimea in 1787, to improve her view.

    They were in town to interview Vladimir Putin, but he didn’t ask any Muscovites to say what they thought of their president, or the elections in March, the invasion of Ukraine, Alexei Navalny, or other imprisoned dissidents.


    The original article contains 646 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      You know who really does “make the trains run on time” and had several prime ministers resign in succession? Japan. You don’t need a dictator for that. Wtf is even the point of that line.

      • poweruser@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Also, Mussolini didn’t make the trains run on time. He forbade the press from reporting the trains running late

  • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    10 months ago

    1 dead opponent who also happened to be a xenophobic, right wing, white nationalist. Did we forget the ICC has a warrant for GW Bush?

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Russia is in large parts culturally xenophobic/nationalist/right-wing, it makes sense they’d want to elect him. Why tf would they elect a leftist leader that has values they don’t hold?

      You can say whatever about Navalny, it doesn’t change that ppl have the right to choose. Locking him up then killing him shouldn’t be allowed and is a clear indicator that he was a huge threat to Putin. Your comment adds nothing unless of course you are implying it’s ok for Putin to kill him because he was flawed too.

      Also Putin has murdered many opponents

      • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        10 months ago

        The people did choose, he polled the lowest of the presidential candidates in the last election. He wasn’t jailed because he ran against Putin, he was jailed for his extreme right wing rhetoric and actions. The US made him a martyr and liberals have fallen for supporting what they would oppose here in the US.

        • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Ah yes, the incredibly reliable Russian polling data for the totally fair and democratic Russian elections! Surely Putin’s government didn’t have any reason to directly manipulate or otherwise skew the data to make their least favorite opponent look bad. And certainly all of Navalny’s supporters felt safe and sound voting for him, without any fear of repercussions from their permanent ruling party.