• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Industry insiders over the past several decades have variously referred to plastic recycling as “uneconomical”, said it “cannot be considered a permanent solid waste solution”, and said it “cannot go on indefinitely”, the revelations show.

    The authors say the evidence demonstrates that oil and petrochemical companies, as well as their trade associations, may have broken laws designed to protect the public from misleading marketing and pollution.

    An internal 1986 report from the trade association the Vinyl Institute noted that “recycling cannot be considered a permanent solid waste solution [to plastics], as it merely prolongs the time until an item is disposed of”.

    Two years ago, California’s attorney general, Rob Bonta, publicly launched an investigation into fossil fuel and petrochemical producers “for their role in causing and exacerbating the global plastics pollution crisis”.

    A toxic train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, last February also catalyzed a movement demanding a ban on vinyl chloride, a carcinogen used to make plastic.

    In 2023, New York state also filed a lawsuit against PepsiCo, saying its single-use plastics violate public nuisance laws, and that the company misled consumers about the effectiveness of recycling.


    The original article contains 1,225 words, the summary contains 188 words. Saved 85%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This article is kind of dumb and malicious. We are the ones buying all this mixed plastic and not separating streams. A lot of people don’t even bother recycling at all. Thermoplastics are known to not work more than once. Its weird even trying to blame anyone other than the companies switching to these terrible products to save 1 cent.