Discussions are getting off-topic and this is an announcement post, not a discussion post, so I’m locking the post.
If local users want to have an in-depth discussion regarding admin moderation of programming.dev, you’re encouraged to make a discussion thread in !meta@programming.dev.
I can only report on what I’ve been told by those who have directly dealt with the reports, my apologies if parts of the phrasing are inaccurate/poorly made. I’ll make a note that we should probably reach out to relevant moderators beforehand next time we make similar actions.
As for differing sensibilities, I’m not sure most people would classify this kind of content as safe to browse at work/in public.
Regardless, we are not here to make demands or argue on how other instances moderate their own content. This post is made mainly to keep our actions transparent to our local users.
Hiding communities outside our predefined rules (politics, porn and bot spam) isn’t something we take lightly, and we are only hiding them now after several months of reoccurring reports that break our instance rules (3.4).
We will do our best to be transparent about when and why we hide a new communities, and be aware that subscribing to a hidden community will unhide it for your feed.
If you do have concerns and suggestions on how to alleviate those, please know that we are happy receive feedback.
@LiveThreadBot@lemmy.world -mod_action buffer_time 86400 !gunners@lemmy.world
!meta@programming.dev is for things related programming.dev, you should repost the question in !git@programming.dev or !programming@programming.dev
If it’s your own blog you’re free to share it in whatever manner you like. If it’s not your own blog you should respect the wishes of the author, meaning ask for permission if you want to copy paste the entire blog. Otherwise, excerpts alongside credits to the author is fine.
This is your second warning to not break our CoC (3.2).
A third warning will result in a temporary ban from programming.dev.