lenin would 1000% write a polemic against us for being distorters of marxism and hed be right

looks at map

missle doesnt fly over any of them

good cop bad cop

I agree thats why, but i still think you should maybe be keeping your strongest communists from dying, theres a reason princes did not often lead their armies into battle, the princes of the soviet union were the smart young cadres. I suppose they felt it necessary in the face of existiential danger of their country, and i empathise with that feeling, but i think keeping 1000 cadres away from the war to study as hard as possible so they could lead the restoration wouldnt have changed the outcome of the war probably

Another good article on the subject

https://redsails.org/really-existing-fascism/

"Describing fascism as the “death-rattle” of stage four obscures the fact that it has been present from the outset. Fascism is just the operational aspect that the unlucky part of the globe gets to experience capitalism as. We need to expand the model into a second dimension to integrate this understanding.

I propose the following:

Primitive communism

Slavery [64]

Feudalism — Ideological superstructure in defense of divine right (monotheistic hereditary land claims)

Capitalism — Ideological superstructure in defense of individual genius (entrepreneurship, race science, will to power)

Expropriative aspect: Primitive accumulation, fascism.

Exploitative aspect: Wage labour, liberalism.

Socialism — Ideological superstructure in defense of mass consciousness (Soviets, democratic dictatorship of the proletariat, scientific socialism)

Multiple aspects (e.g. “Socialism with X characteristics”)

Communism — Ideological superstructure no longer has any class or state content.

This model conceives of the Axis powers as failed fascist experiments in empire-building, and the North Atlantic empires as successful ones. Fascism as an accusation stops relying on a cartoonish depiction of the Nazis as a cautionary tale of a potential future dystopia. Instead, it captures the fact that vicious dehumanizing brutality is co-constitutive of the violent, white supremacist, “freedom-loving” Western worldview.

the fact that kruschev came to power shows us that the party was completely degraded. It is clear that the party absolutely and completely failed to raise a new generation of quality communists, in no small part to ww2 killing 27 million soviets, but honestly im not willing to give them slack, if they had put significant resources into elevating women into future leaders they would have definitly been able to put quality communists in charge.

im just praying my shit ass government distributes something like this country wide so maybe 60% of the population get it, thatd be nice

REAL

thats a really great comparison that i always forget, they do defy the media apparatus when it suits their taste

the question regarded ethics, in this case i think the correct ethical thing to do is inform them. As an aside i dont think i support concealed carry, if someone is carrying a weapon capable of killing multiple people i think that should be declared so people know to stay away from them

generally i think the correct time is in the ad (“i am renting a room in my flat for co habitation”)

just because youre hiding the power dynamic doesnt mean there isnt one there.

If my flatmate was my landlord that would wildly change how i would behave towards them out of self preservation.

youre depriving them of the oppurtunity to act caustiously towards you because youre ‘chill, trust me’ and you dont want them on their gaurd even though they should be on their gaurd, because you weild the power to make them homeless

edit: also how are you even hiding it, dont they have to send you the money? or sign a contract?

economists also go to university

surely not right, the mig is a soviet plane, surely its missles arent grifts

Edit: maybe youre talking about the israeli missle mb

try forming a reading group with people (or even just reading), if your country is really a dead end politically you can still potentially contribute in the future to communism by writing some theory, even bad theory might help the next marx sharpen their blade, young hegelian style

it also comes up from when you click on a thread at it says 40 comments and you go on and there is no comments, because the only top level comments are from people you blocked ( i block after very little annonyance)

yeh but murdering babies of a race of “”“monsters”“” that can talk because theyre evil has real world implications in how people view others, see every liberal calling russian’s “orcs”, and especially with israel and its ongoing genocide of the palestianians, where they frequently call palestianian children and civilians vermin that need to be wiped out before they become a problem

fiction is a mirror for reality, when a writer writes something like this, it indicates their biases in the real world. When a writer writes in a demi human race who you need to kill the babies of, thats because the writer wants that race to exist

running from one colony to another

it doesnt look like a very impressive tree tho does it, would yggdrasil really burn down from a fire? Its the strongest wood in the whole world! (maybe the tree is extremely far away)