The European Commission paid €360,000 (about $428,000) for a study on how piracy impacts the sales of copyrighted music, books, video games, and movies. But the EU never shared the report—possibly because it determined that there is no evidence that piracy is a major problem.
Would it be a good practice to prefix or suffix “old news” by something like the year they were published in?
I mean I have no problem with “old news” at all. Most stuff of importance that was published in the past was missed, right? but it may be misleading to click this one thinking it is recent, when it is actually a 2017 piece…
How about wording it like:
“The EU Suppressed a 300-Page Study That Found Piracy Doesn’t Harm Sales [2017]” ?
Would it be a good practice to prefix or suffix “old news” by something like the year they were published in?
I mean I have no problem with “old news” at all. Most stuff of importance that was published in the past was missed, right? but it may be misleading to click this one thinking it is recent, when it is actually a 2017 piece…
How about wording it like:
“The EU Suppressed a 300-Page Study That Found Piracy Doesn’t Harm Sales [2017]” ?